ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
Graph convolutional networks for inferring cell-cell communication from spatial transcriptomics data.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Single-cell spatial transcriptomics provides gene expression measurements of individual cells while preserving their spatial positions within tissue. Cell-cell communication (CCC) can be inferred by comparing the predictions of held-out gene expression levels by a pair of models: one that incorporates cellular neighborhood information and another that does not. The performance gap indicates the influence of CCC. However, existing methods that adopt this general approach often rely on spatially informed models that use simplistic representations of spatial context. This reliance on such representations does not merely lead to suboptimal predictions: it undermines the validity of the model comparison itself, which hinges on the accurate estimation of conditional expectations. Results: We propose using a graph convolutional network (GCN) as a highly expressive spatially informed model, with cells as nodes and spatial proximity as edges. In semi-synthetic datasets, we show that several existing approaches relying on simplistic neighborhood features can produce spurious inferences about CCC, whereas our GCN-based approach avoids these pitfalls. In MERFISH and Xenium mouse brain tissue, our method identifies genes with known spatial variation, suggesting that it successfully infers CCC-affected genes. Availability and implementation: Code to reproduce our results is available from https://github.com/prob-ml/spice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.