ArticleACS central science2026
Predicting Enantioselectivity via Kinetic Simulations on Gigantic Reaction Path Networks.
Article in ACS central science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asymmetric catalysts exert control over the reactivity and enantioselectivity of chemical reactions, often through their large size and highly flexible geometries. Most computational approaches rely on a predefined selectivity-determining step and assume that selectivity follows the Boltzmann distribution of transition-state conformers. Going beyond this conventional framework, we constructed a reaction path network that captures the kinetically accessible regions of the potential energy surface. A delta-learning neural network potential (ΔNNP) was constructed and applied to an asymmetric organocatalyst of the imidodiphosphorimidates family, comprising over 200 atoms. The ΔNNP achieved DFT-level accuracy with GFN2-xTB as the baseline. Using the ΔNNP-based single component-artificial force induced reaction (denoted by NNP/AFIR) method, we constructed a reaction path network containing 48,463 paths. Kinetic simulations based on this network predicted the reaction mechanism and enantioselectivity. Within the network, numerous paths, including asynchronous concerted and stepwise mechanisms, were found to be energetically competitive and thus to contribute to the overall kinetics. Traffic volume analysis further revealed that intermediates with negligible yields can still play important kinetic roles. Overall, the NNP/AFIR approach provides a powerful framework not only for deepening mechanistic understanding but also for accelerating the rational design of asymmetric catalytic systems with high reactivity and enantioselectivity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.