ArticlePeerJ2026
Impact of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter size within 24 hours of hospital admission on outcome events in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prognosis of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is closely related to the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) size. However, the associations between LVEDD, pre-admission risk factors, admission biochemical markers, and medication use warrant further investigation. The prognostic impact of LVEDD evaluation within 24 hours of admission in STEMI patients has not been extensively studied. Methods: We analyzed the association between LVEDD measurements within 24 hours of admission and a composite endpoint of cardiovascular events and mortality in 664 STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients were categorized into three groups based on LVEDD size. Multiple regression models examined the relationship among pre-admission factors, biochemical markers, medication use, and LVEDD. Results: Composite endpoint events occurred in 249 patients. A larger admission LVEDD was associated with a higher risk of endpoint events (hazard ratio (HR) 1.032; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.004-1.061]; Conclusion: LVEDD measurement within 24 hours of admission is crucial for predicting composite endpoint events in STEMI patients. An elevated risk is observed in patients with LVEDD greater than 47 mm, which is further amplified when LVEDD surpasses 54 mm. Identifying independent factors influencing LVEDD and clinical outcomes provides valuable insights for clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.