Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038432›Full record

ArticleSmart molecules : open access2026

Mechanism elucidation of cell-selective fluorescent probes.

Sourav Sarkar, Young-Tae Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Smart molecules : open access, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sourav SarkarSenPro Inc. Pohang Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1183-2414
Young-Tae ChangDepartment of Chemistry Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH) Pohang Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1927-3688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-selective fluorescent probes have emerged as essential tools for live-cell imaging, enabling the differentiation of specific cell types within complex biological systems. Unlike traditional antibody-based methods that target extracellular proteins, small-molecule probes can access intracellular environments and exploit diverse biochemical features for selective retention or activation. This perspective categorizes the mechanisms of cell selectivity into five principal strategies: Protein-oriented, carbohydrate-oriented, lipid-oriented, gating-oriented, and metabolism-oriented live-cell distinctions. Each class capitalizes on a unique cellular trait ranging from protein expression and membrane composition to transporter activity and metabolic enzyme presence. We discuss representative examples of each mechanism, outline a decision-tree workflow for elucidating a new probe's mode of action, and highlight how understanding these mechanisms is critical for both basic biological research and therapeutic probe design. Looking ahead, the development of such mechanism-informed cell-specific probes holds promise for advancing precision cell targeting in biomedical applications.

Indexed as

bioimagingfluorescent probeslive‐cell distinctiontargeted therapeutics

Identifiers

PMID42038432
PMCPMC13104124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.