ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Respiratory adverse events associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: an analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Respiratory adverse events associated with programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors have emerged as an important safety concern in clinical oncology. With the expanding use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a comprehensive evaluation of real-world respiratory toxicity is essential to optimize clinical risk management. This study aimed to systematically characterize the occurrence patterns and pharmacovigilance signals of respiratory adverse events related to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Reports of suspected adverse events associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were extracted from the FAERS database, covering the period from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2025. Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders were identified according to the System Organ Class (SOCs) and Preferred Terms (PTs) of MedDRA version 27.0. Disproportionality analyses were performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), information component (IC025), and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were further conducted to explore factors associated with respiratory adverse event reporting. Results: A total of 163,193 reports identified PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as the primary suspected drugs. Pneumonia-related signals were consistently detected across most ICIs, indicating a shared pattern of pulmonary toxicity encompassing both infectious pneumonia and immune-related pneumonitis. Respiratory adverse events predominantly occurred during the early treatment phase, particularly within the first 60 days, with a secondary increase observed after prolonged exposure exceeding six months. Elderly patients (≥65 years) accounted for a substantial proportion of cases and exhibited a higher frequency of fatal outcomes. Regression analyses demonstrated that sex, reporting region, and drug class were significantly associated with respiratory adverse event reporting. Conclusions: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are associated with a significant risk of respiratory adverse events in real-world clinical practice. Early and targeted respiratory monitoring is warranted, particularly during the initial treatment phase and among elderly patients. These findings highlight the need for optimized risk stratification and proactive management strategies to improve the safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.