ArticleDrug target insights
Molecular docking and dynamics analysis of selected phytocompounds against multi-targeted hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Drug target insights. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with a five-year survival rate of only 19%. Although Sorafenib is the primary systemic therapy, its limited efficacy and complex interactions with signaling pathways highlight the need for multi-target drugs. Methods: This study evaluates the anti-cancer properties of selected phytochemicals against six key HCC target proteins, utilizing sorafenib tosylate as a positive control. Molecular docking was performed to evaluate binding affinities and interactions, and ADME/T predictions were generated to estimate drug-like properties. The top-ranking candidates were further evaluated using 100-ns molecular dynamics simulations to analyze conformational stability, protein-ligand interactions, and residue mobility. Results: Silymarin (SA) emerged as the most effective compound, demonstrating greater predicted inhibitory activity than Sorafenib. SA showed high binding affinity for target proteins 6HH1 (-9.9 kcal/mol) and 1CM8 (-9.6 kcal/mol). Molecular dynamics simulations also revealed increased stability of the SA-protein complexes, particularly for the 1CM8-SA complex, which maintained high conformational stability. The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) value was found to be around 2.1 Å, and the root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF) values were below 3 Å, indicating lower protein flexibility compared to both the native and sorafenib-bound complexes. Conclusion: These computational findings provide a strong theoretical basis for Silymarin's efficacy as a highly potent, multi-targeted therapeutic agent against HCC. The improved stability and binding properties of Silymarin compared with Sorafenib provide a strong rationale for advancing this compound into preclinical and clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.