Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038325›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Efficacy and safety of Guanylyl cyclase C agonists (linaclotide and plecanatide) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zihao Zhou, Yuanlin Li, Yuyuan Tu, Meiling He, Defu Liao, Ziyan He, Zhiren Liu, Boyu Li, Zugang Zhou, Shuangchun Ai

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zihao Zhou *School of Health and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yuanlin Li *School of Health and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yuyuan Tu *School of Health and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Meiling HeDepartment of Rehabilitation, Mianyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Mianyang, China.
Defu LiaoSchool of Health and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Ziyan HeSchool of Health and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Zhiren LiuSchool of Health and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Boyu LiSchool of Health and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Zugang ZhouDepartment of Rehabilitation, Mianyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Mianyang, China.
Shuangchun AiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Mianyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Mianyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Guanylyl cyclase C (GCC) agonists, including linaclotide and plecanatide, induce prosecretory and analgesic effects by elevating cGMP levels in the intestinal lumen, rendering them significant treatment alternatives for constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C). Nonetheless, disparities in efficacy and safety across medications and dosages necessitate a thorough assessment using systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily focusing on composite efficacy endpoints approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the aforementioned GCC agonists with placebo for the treatment of IBS-C. The search timeframe spans from the establishment of each database to 7 September 2025. Three researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment (using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving the FDA composite endpoint. Secondary endpoints include indicators related to abdominal pain and constipation. The safety outcome was the incidence of diarrhea. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 18.0 software. Results: A total of 6 linaclotide and 3 plecanatide trials were included, involving 5,718 patients with IBS-C. Compared with placebo, GCC agonists significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving the FDA composite endpoint (linaclotide 290 μg [relative risk (RR) = 1.78, 95% CI 1.51-2.09]; plecanatide 3 mg [RR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.35-1.96]; plecanatide 6 mg [RR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.36-2.05]). GCC agonists also demonstrated significant advantages across all secondary outcome measures. However, the incidence of diarrhea was significantly higher in both drug groups compared to the placebo group (linaclotide 290 μg [relative risk (RR) = 6.20, 95% CI 4.39-8.76]; plecanatide 3 mg [RR = 5.29, 95% CI 1.59-17.64]; plecanatide 6 mg [RR = 4.00, 95% CI 1.52-10.51]). Conclusion: Linaclotide and plecanatide are effective medications for treating IBS-C, significantly improving both abdominal pain and constipation symptoms while increasing the risk of diarrhea. Their efficacy and safety should be carefully weighed when used clinically. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251168079, Identifier CRD420251168079.

Indexed as

constipationguanylyl cyclase C agonistsirritable bowel syndromelinaclotidemeta-analysisplecanatiderandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID42038325
PMCPMC13106150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.