Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038297›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Gaps and paths forward in cancer pharmacology and translational research.

Elizabeth A Hughes, Lindsay L Davenport, Christopher Zdyrski, Aleksandra Pawlak, Jonathan P Mochel, Eugene F Douglass

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth A HughesPharmaceutical and Biomedical Science, College of Pharmacy, UGA, Athens, GA, United States.
Lindsay L DavenportPharmaceutical and Biomedical Science, College of Pharmacy, UGA, Athens, GA, United States.
Christopher ZdyrskiPrecision One Health Initiative, Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, GA, United States.
Aleksandra PawlakPrecision One Health Initiative, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, GA, United States.
Jonathan P MochelPrecision One Health Initiative, Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, GA, United States.
Eugene F DouglassPharmaceutical and Biomedical Science, College of Pharmacy, UGA, Athens, GA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As drug development costs continue to rise, there is a need to reframe how drug efficacy is evaluated in preclinical models to reduce the rate of false positives. The "valley of death" refers to the gap between bench research and clinical translation. In particular, oncology chemotherapies have the highest rate of drug failure compared to other drug classes. While there has been progress in overall cancer survival, some cancers and patient populations still have a poor prognosis. To bridge the gaps of drug failure and aid underserved patient populations, drug translation cannot be viewed as a purely linear process, but one in which continual refinement is used to create more efficacious drug candidates. Additionally, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling could prove instrumental in better understanding drug efficacy in cellular models and in evaluating clinical translation potential with greater accuracy. The path forward in clinical pharmacology is to view drug development and efficacy as a dynamic process rather than a purely linear fashion. This review discusses traditional pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation methods, as well as pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models of tumor growth inhibition.

Indexed as

cancer drug discovery and developmentdrug efficacyPK-PD (pharamacokinetic-pharmacodynamic) modeltranslational gaptranslational medicine

Identifiers

PMID42038297
PMCPMC13106357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.