ArticleBiodiversity data journal2026
RECODE - Relational Ecological COrpus for Data Extraction.
Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ecology, conservation biology and related disciplines are inherently data-based, with the success of many research projects and initiatives (e.g., protected areas, monitoring plans etc.) being directly dependent on the availability of location and trait information on species and populations. Unfortunately, this data is often either non-existent or available only as unstructured text within publications, especially for megadiverse taxa such as many invertebrate orders. With the emergence of large language models, there have been many attempts to automatically parse such data in machine-readable formats with variable success, either using prompt engineering or training models fit-for-purpose through named entity recognition and relation extraction. Model training has proven more efficient for complex data relations, but it needs labelled corpora, i.e. curated training data containing examples of this information for models to statistically learn from. This is a time-consuming process and, to our knowledge, no standard datasets exist upon which to train new and increasingly better models being released at an increasingly fast pace. New information: Here we describe RECODE, a manually annotated corpus of ecological and taxonomic literature, aimed at training and fine-tuning models for automated extraction of occurrence and trait data from unstructured text. All documents presented at this stage have been annotated and validated by experts familiar with the traits of the test taxa (spiders and insects).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.