ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Strategic recruitment and retention for pediatric research: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of recruitment and retention strategies in pediatric clinical studies, focusing on achieving adequate representation across a range of demographic considerations. Study design: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, PsycNET, and Cochrane databases to identify articles published between January 1, 1993, and September 1, 2024. Inclusion criteria targeted general pediatric studies emphasizing recruitment diversity. We compared success rates of these strategies across different races and ethnicities, targeted age groups, and community location, to current published national recruitment rates in pediatric research. Results: Of the 2,272 studies identified, 23 studies were included that detailed specific recruitment and retention strategies specifically targeting diverse pediatric populations for general pediatric health topics. These studies enrolled a total of 5,482 participants with ages ranging from 0.55-19.8 years of age for child and adolescent populations, and a mean parental age of 35.5 years for studies targeting parents of children. Community-based recruitment strategies were most effective for engaging underrepresented populations. Family services and flexible scheduling were particularly effective for parents and young children, while monetary compensation and group-oriented efforts resonated more with adolescents. Retention strategies, including flexible scheduling, family services, and compensation, were successful across populations. Conclusion: Tailored recruitment and retention strategies addressing cultural, social, and logistical needs are essential for ensuring diversity of age, race, ethnicity and geographic location in pediatric research. Community-based strategies enhanced recruitment, while compensation and logistical incentives, such as follow-up reminders and family services improved retention. Addressing data gaps on recruitment and retention efforts are critical for future research to achieve adequate representation and improve health outcomes in pediatrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.