ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
No association detected between posterior tibial slope, static anterior tibial translation and medial meniscus repair failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- No association detected between posterior tibial slope, static anterior tibial translation and medial meniscus repair failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the posterior tibial slope (PTS) and static anterior tibial translation (SATT) on the success of medial meniscus (MM) repair performed concomitantly with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients who underwent primary ACLR using hamstring autograft combined with isolated MM repair between January 2014 and December 2017, and a minimum follow-up of 6 years, were included. Patients who had undergone meniscectomy or lateral meniscus repair were excluded. Demographic data, PTS, SATT, dynamic anterior tibial translation (DATT), the need for reoperation (at the same location) for MM repair failure (MMRF), and time to failure were recorded. Comparative analyses were performed using thresholds of 12° for PTS and 5 mm for SATT. Univariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for MMRF. Results: Among the 148 patients included, 14 (9.4%) experienced a MMRF at a mean of 24 ± 16 months post-operatively (range 7-60 months). Twenty-eight percent of patients had undergone concomitant lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). There were no significant differences between the MMRF and non-failure groups in terms of age, sex, presence of LET, PTS, SATT or DATT. Patients with PTS ≥ 12° (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-11.6; Conclusion: No statistically significant association was detected between PTS, SATT, DATT, age or the presence of LET and MMRF after hamstring ACLR. However, larger studies are needed, particularly in high-slope subgroups. Increased PTS or SATT alone should not discourage MM repair in the setting of ACLR. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective case-control study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.