Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038137›Full record

ReviewGalen medical journal2024

Long-Term Outcomes and Survival Rates of Patients Undergoing Biopsy Vs. Maximum Safe Resection for Thalamic Lesions: A Short Review on Current Evidence.

Ehsan Jangholi, Hadi Anjomshoaa, Parvin Malek Mohammadi, Parisa Rostambeygi, Afsaneh Halili, Mohammad Rahimi, Kamkar Aeinfar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Galen medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ehsan JangholiBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hadi AnjomshoaaDepartment of Psychology and Counselling, Farhangian University, P.O.Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran.
Parvin Malek MohammadiDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Parisa RostambeygiDepartment of Nursing, Estahban Branch, Islamic Azad University, Estahban, Iran.
Afsaneh HaliliDepartment of Critical Care Nursing, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad RahimiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran.
Kamkar AeinfarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thalamic lesion is one of the most challenging tumors with significant mortality and morbidities. Current literature highlights the importance of individualized treatment strategies tailored to the specific characteristics of the lesion and the patient. In terms of efficacy, studies have demonstrated that maximal safe resection (MSR) of thalamic lesions can lead to better tumor control, prolonged progression-free survival, and improved overall survival rates compared to biopsy alone. However, the feasibility of achieving MSR is highly dependent on the location, size, and histology of the lesion, as well as the patient's functional status and overall health. Also, surgical interventions in the thalamus carry inherent risks of neurological deficits, including sensory, motor, and cognitive impairments, depending on the extent of surgical resection and proximity to eloquent neural structures. On the other hand, biopsy remains a valuable diagnostic tool for obtaining tissue samples and establishing a definitive histological diagnosis in cases where MSR is not feasible or poses a high risk of neurological complications. Indeed, biopsy is preferred in patients with advanced age, significant comorbidities, or lesions located in eloquent regions of the thalamus where aggressive surgical resection may result in considerable morbidity. Quality of life (QoL) outcomes, including functional status, symptom burden, and overall well-being, are important endpoints in evaluating the impact of treatment approaches for thalamic lesions on patients' daily activities. While MSR may offer potential long-term benefits in terms of tumor control and survival outcomes, it may also be associated with a higher risk of neurological deficits and functional impairments that can impact QoL postoperatively. Conversely, biopsy may involve less invasive procedures and shorter recovery times, resulting in better preserved functional status and improved QoL in selected patient populations.

Indexed as

BiopsyNeurological DeficitQuality of LifeSurgical ResectionThalamus

Identifiers

PMID42038137
PMCPMC11826396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.