ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Reimagining Sexual Abuse Prevention for Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review of Educational Gaps and Inclusive Future Directions.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sexual abuse remains a pervasive global public health concern, disproportionately affecting adolescents with intellectual disabilities (ID). While numerous educational interventions have been developed, most remain fragmented, context-specific, and rarely account for cultural and systemic disparities across settings. A comprehensive and inclusive synthesis is needed to reimagine prevention strategies for this vulnerable population. Objective: This scoping review aimed to reimagine sexual abuse prevention by systematically mapping existing educational models, identifying gaps, and outlining inclusive future directions for adolescents with ID. Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR guideline, a comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and ScienceDirect, supplemented by grey literature and reference list screening. Eligibility was guided by the PCC (Population-Concept-Context) framework. Studies published between 2015 and 2025 involving adolescents with diagnosed ID (aged 12-18) were included. Data were thematically synthesized, and methodological quality descriptively assessed using the MMAT and JBI checklists. Results: Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, spanning diverse contexts from high-income to low- and middle-income countries. Interventions included school-based curricula, community workshops, digital platforms, and family-centered programs. While knowledge and awareness improved across most studies, evidence of sustained behavioral change was limited. Key gaps included inadequate cultural adaptation, limited caregiver involvement, and systemic barriers such as stigma and insufficient provider training. Although some programs demonstrated strong content validity, scalability and long-term effectiveness remain underexplored. Conclusion: This review reimagines sexual abuse prevention as an inclusive, multi-level endeavor that extends beyond knowledge provision to engage caregivers, educators, and health systems. Future research must prioritize longitudinal designs, cultural tailoring, and systemic integration to build sustainable, equitable, and context-sensitive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.