Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038102›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026

Male Partners' Experiences with a Postpartum Haemorrhage Requiring Surgery: A Qualitative Study.

Oda Sibille Moerk Moen, Bente Dahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oda Sibille Moerk MoenFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway (USN), Borre, Norway.
Bente DahlFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway (USN), Borre, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7553-8233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To explore how male partners experience the sequence of events from the onset of a postpartum haemorrhage until the birthing woman has completed surgical treatment and is transferred to the postnatal ward. Participants and Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with eleven male partners living in five different counties in south-eastern Norway. The interviews were carried out in January 2024. Systematic text condensation was used to analyse the data. Results: The data analysis identified three result categories. First, the men reported feeling "trapped in an information vacuu". Many experienced prolonged periods of waiting alone, often for hours, without receiving timely updates. When information was eventually provided, it was often too vague to understand. Second, the men expressed feeling overwhelmed by the responsibility of caring for a newborn on their own. Finally, the extended hours of waiting without news of their partner's condition heightened their anxiety, allowing their fears and imagination to spiral, including the fear that they might never see her again. Conclusion: Male partners of women experiencing postpartum haemorrhage require emotional support and regular updates on their partner's condition while they are in the operative theatre and intensive care unit. Additionally, there is a need to develop maternity care models that address the needs of both the woman and her partner during traumatic events. Midwives play a crucial role in providing support and fostering open communication, which can significantly improve the experience for both partners in challenging situations.

Indexed as

interviewmale partnerpostpartum haemorrhagequalitative

Identifiers

PMID42038102
PMCPMC13110026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.