ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Psychometric evaluation of the DSM-5-TR-Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure: transdiagnostic factor analysis in a real-world psychiatric outpatient sample.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dimensional approaches to psychiatric assessment are increasingly used to complement categorical diagnoses. The DSM-TR Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (DSM-XC) assesses symptoms across psychopathology domains, but its latent structure remains unexplored in large, real-world psychiatric outpatient populations, limiting guidance on how clinicians interpret and apply results. Methods: We analyzed real-world data from patients ( Results: The 6-factor general model identified domains of 'Mood', 'Anxiety', 'Depression', 'Psychosis', 'Substance Use', and 'Distress and Disconnection'. The 5-factor bifactor model demonstrated a strong general psychopathology factor. The Caspi-inspired model showed acceptable fit but weaker support for the specific dimensions. These results underscore the DSM-XC's capacity to capture both shared and domain-specific dimensions of psychopathology, highlighting its relevance for dimensional assessment. Conclusion: By clarifying its latent structure, this study identified clinically meaningful symptom dimensions which helps facilitate interpretation and application of the DSM-XC in the real-world. As dimensional and measurement-based approaches continue to expand in psychiatry, clearer understanding of tools such as the DSM-XC may support their integration into clinical practice and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.