ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Identifying neuroimaging biomarkers for anxiety in emerging adults using machine learning and functional near-infrared spectroscopy during resting-state.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The neuroimaging biomarkers for anxiety diagnosis remain poorly understood. This study aims to identify cortical regions whose hemodynamic patterns, derived from resting-state functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) combined with machine learning, may serve as potential biomarkers to assist in the assessment of anxiety cases. Methods: The final sample comprised ninety participants in emerging adulthood: 50 anxiety patients and 40 healthy controls (HC). After demographic data collection and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) administration, all participants underwent a 1-minute baseline measurement and a 5-minute resting-state fNIRS recording. Following a stratified 70:30 train-test split, all feature selection procedures were performed using the training set. Model tuning and stability were assessed by five-fold stratified cross-validation within the training set, and final performance was evaluated on the independent test set. Results: The machine-learning GBDT model utilized 13 distinct features and exhibited enhanced efficacy in discriminating between patients with anxiety and healthy controls compared with the RF classification model typically employed for anxiety identification (AUC: 0.900 vs. 0.832, sensitivity = 0.921, and specificity = 0.709). SHAP-based interpretability analysis revealed that oxyhemoglobin (HbO) fluctuations in the prefrontal regions, particularly the dorsolateral/middle frontal/orbital middle frontal gyrus and sensorimotor-visual areas (precentral/middle occipital gyrus), emerged as potential predictors. Conclusion: The study provides a new perspective for the development of anxiety diagnosis tools and contributes candidate biomarkers for anxiety disorder identification and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.