ArticleJournal of Cancer2026
Circulating Tumor Cells Detected Using EpAb3-5 as Prognostic Indicators in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: EpAb3-5, an anti-EpCAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule) neutralizing antibody, enhances circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection, but its clinical and prognostic relevance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 66 HNSCC patients. CTCs were enumerated using EpAb3-5 and a commercial EpCAM-based platform (MACS), and tumor EpCAM expression detected using EpAb3-5 was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Associations with clinicopathologic features were evaluated, and survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models, truncated at five years. Results: EpAb3-5 detected significantly more CTCs than MACS (p < 0.001), indicating greater detection sensitivity. Tumor EpCAM expression detected by EpAb3-5 correlated with nodal status (p < 0.01) but not T classification or overall stage. Although EpAb3-5-detected EpCAM expression alone was not an independent predictor of overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS), its integration with tumor staging revealed a context-dependent prognostic association. Specifically, low EpCAM expression assessed using EpAb3-5 identified early-stage patients with better OS (p < 0.05), whereas no significant survival differences were observed in advanced-stage disease. Conclusions: EpAb3-5 enhances CTC detection compared with a conventional EpCAM-based method and provides complementary prognostic information when interpreted alongside tumor staging. These findings indicate that EpCAM immunoreactivity assessed using EpAb3-5 may assist in refining risk stratification in early-stage HNSCC; however, these observations should be considered exploratory and warrant further validation in larger prospective cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.