Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037955›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Intraneural Hemangioma: A Report of Two Cases.

Jodie B Thomas, Shreyas Panchagnula, Wendy S Towers, Nima Sharifai, Khalid H Kurtom

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jodie B ThomasNeurosurgery, University of Maryland Shore Regional Health, Easton, USA.
Shreyas PanchagnulaNeurosurgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, USA.
Wendy S TowersNeurosurgery, University of Maryland Shore Regional Health, Easton, USA.
Nima SharifaiPathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Khalid H KurtomNeurosurgery, University of Maryland Shore Regional Health, Easton, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal hemangiomas are congenital vascular malformations. Most reports of spinal hemangiomas describe resection via traditional open approaches; however, advances in minimally invasive surgery have led to comparable results. We report on two cases, namely, one nerve root intraneural hemangioma and one nerve root extraforaminal hemangioma, both removed utilizing a minimally invasive technique. Case 1 is about a 61-year-old woman who presented with low back pain with left lower extremity radiculopathy refractory to maximum medical management. This was secondary to an enhancing mass at the right L4-L5 neural foramen (2.4×2.2×2.1 cm) with impingement of the right L4 nerve root. A minimally invasive right L4 nerve sheath mass resection with right-sided L4-L5 transforaminal interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation was performed. Final pathology was consistent with a benign spindle cell proliferation, indicative of hemangioma. Case 2 is about a 52-year-old man who presented with low back pain with bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy. This was secondary to an enhancing intradural extramedullary lesion (1.4×0.8×1.1 cm) in the spinal canal at the L4 vertebral body with resulting canal stenosis. A minimally invasive L4 intradural spinal mass resection was performed. Final pathology was consistent with intraneural hemangioma.

Indexed as

benign spindle cell proliferation hemangiomaintraneural hemangiomaminimally invasive spine surgerynerve sheath hemangiomaspinal hemangioma

Identifiers

PMID42037955
PMCPMC13105414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.