ArticleCureus2026
Intraneural Hemangioma: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal hemangiomas are congenital vascular malformations. Most reports of spinal hemangiomas describe resection via traditional open approaches; however, advances in minimally invasive surgery have led to comparable results. We report on two cases, namely, one nerve root intraneural hemangioma and one nerve root extraforaminal hemangioma, both removed utilizing a minimally invasive technique. Case 1 is about a 61-year-old woman who presented with low back pain with left lower extremity radiculopathy refractory to maximum medical management. This was secondary to an enhancing mass at the right L4-L5 neural foramen (2.4×2.2×2.1 cm) with impingement of the right L4 nerve root. A minimally invasive right L4 nerve sheath mass resection with right-sided L4-L5 transforaminal interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation was performed. Final pathology was consistent with a benign spindle cell proliferation, indicative of hemangioma. Case 2 is about a 52-year-old man who presented with low back pain with bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy. This was secondary to an enhancing intradural extramedullary lesion (1.4×0.8×1.1 cm) in the spinal canal at the L4 vertebral body with resulting canal stenosis. A minimally invasive L4 intradural spinal mass resection was performed. Final pathology was consistent with intraneural hemangioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.