ReviewCureus2026
Can Scorpion Venom Peptides Be Safely Used in Cardiovascular Therapy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scorpion venom contains numerous bioactive peptides with potent cardiovascular effects, including bradykinin-potentiating peptides (BPPs), ion channel modulators, and cardioprotective molecules. These peptides show promise for conditions such as hypertension, cardiac injury, and arrhythmias. However, concerns regarding toxicity, immunogenicity, and off-target actions have limited their clinical development. This systematic review evaluates the therapeutic potential and safety of scorpion venom peptides for cardiovascular applications. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar identified 1,141 articles. Screening of 463 abstracts and full-text review of 446 eligible studies resulted in 17 publications meeting the inclusion criteria. Extracted data included mechanisms, efficacy, toxicity, and translational challenges. BPPs consistently demonstrated ACE inhibition, B2 receptor activation, and significant antihypertensive effects in animal models. Several peptides also showed cardioprotective activities by reducing oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. Ion channel-active peptides influenced cardiac electrophysiology, but many showed proarrhythmic risks due to hERG potassium channel blockade or interactions with Nav1.4/1.5 sodium channels. Structure-activity modification studies improved specificity and reduced toxicity in selected variants. Despite encouraging preclinical data, no scorpion venom peptide has progressed to clinical trials for cardiovascular indications. Major barriers include immunogenicity, instability, delivery challenges, and safety concerns. Scorpion venom peptides represent promising leads for novel cardiovascular therapeutics, particularly as antihypertensive and cardioprotective agents. However, significant toxicological and translational limitations remain. Advances in peptide engineering, targeted delivery, and clinical evaluation are crucial for safely harnessing their therapeutic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.