Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037931›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Patients With Obesity on the Acute Care Surgery Service: Improving Outcomes.

Sanjiv F Gray, Beatrice Dieudonne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanjiv F GraySurgery, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, USA.
Beatrice DieudonneSurgery, Gray's Clinic, Windermere, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a chronic, progressive disease affecting approximately 40% of adults in the United States and now represents a defining characteristic of the emergency general surgery (EGS) population. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that obesity, particularly class III, class IV, and class V obesity, is associated with significantly worse clinical outcomes following emergency surgical intervention, including higher rates of postoperative complications, venous thromboembolism (VTE), respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, increased readmissions, and higher mortality. Importantly, many adverse outcomes are not driven by operative mortality alone but by failure-to-rescue following preventable complications. This narrative review critically examines outcome data for obese EGS patients and argues that systematic adoption of bariatric surgery quality frameworks, including standardized pathways for infection prevention, VTE prophylaxis, nutrition, opioid stewardship, and post-discharge follow-up, represents a pragmatic and evidence-based strategy to improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

emergencynutritionobesitysurgerytrauma

Identifiers

PMID42037931
PMCPMC13102549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.