Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037899›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Clinical, Radiological and Histopathological Analysis of Metastatic Tumors of the Oral and Maxillofacial Region: A Retrospective Case Series.

Anjitha V A, Ramesh S, Tinky C Bose, Nihala P A, Fathima Shirin C R

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anjitha V ADepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Government Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, IND.
Ramesh SDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Government Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, IND.
Tinky C BoseDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Government Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, IND.
Nihala P ADepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Government Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, IND.
Fathima Shirin C RDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Kothamangalam, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim Oral metastatic tumors are rare and may present as vague pain or painless swellings and are misdiagnosed as odontogenic pathologic entities such as odontogenic cysts, tumors, pulpal or periapical diseases, etc. Since oral metastatic tumors are uncommon, the diagnosis of oral metastatic tumors is challenging for clinicians and pathologists. In this study, we aimed to analyze the clinical, histopathological, and radiological characteristics of oral metastatic tumors to assist clinicians and pathologists in achieving early diagnosis and proper management. Materials and methods The clinical, histopathological, and radiological characteristics of patients diagnosed with metastatic tumors of the oral cavity over the past 10 years at the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology in Government Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram were retrospectively collected and analyzed. We analyzed complete medical and dental records of 1434 patients to assess the prevalence of oral metastatic tumors. A detailed analysis of clinical and radiological features of metastatic tumors was done by Oral Medicine and Radiology specialists. The primary tumor site and histopathological features were also evaluated.  Results Among 1434 cases, 10 (0.69%) cases of oral metastatic tumors with equal gender distribution (five male patients & five female patients) and a mean age of 54 years were obtained. In our retrospective study, the mandible was the most frequent site of metastases, and the most frequent complaint was painless swelling. Our findings demonstrated a consistent relationship between specific primary sites and gender, notably lung cancer in male patients and breast and thyroid cancer in female patients. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histological diagnosis, accounting for 50.0% (five out of ten cases) of the cases, and unilocular radiolucency was the most prevalent radiological presentation. Conclusion Our study showed that oral metastatic tumors frequently masquerade as benign conditions, most commonly presenting as painless swelling and unilocular radiolucencies. The high predilection for the posterior mandible (70%) and the significant association between specific primary sites and gender, notably lung cancer in male patients and breast/thyroid cancer in female patients, highlight the need for a high index of suspicion. Ultimately, as metastatic tumors of the oral cavity often mimic common dental pathologies, clinicians must prioritize thorough historical review and histological evaluation, particularly in older patients, to ensure early diagnosis and appropriate management of secondary malignancies.

Indexed as

adenocarcinomabreast cancerlung cancermandiblemaxillaoral metastatic tumorsparesthesiathyroid cancerunilocular radiolucencies

Identifiers

PMID42037899
PMCPMC13106964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.