ArticleCureus2026
Nonresective Emergency Management of Perforated Sigmoid Diverticulitis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report aims to demonstrate that it is not always necessary to resect the sigmoid colon in emergency surgery for perforated diverticulitis. We have found that in several cases, most of the sigmoid is in fact quite healthy, and the perforation is limited to a very small area. This is demonstrated by a recent case where a 44-year-old male presented to our care with severe sepsis and extensive peritonitis with abscess formation. At emergency surgery, the abscess was drained, but the abdominal sepsis was too extensive to permit safe resection and primary anastomosis. The sigmoid was severed at the site of perforation, and the distal stump was oversewn and tacked near the colostomy site with no resection of the sigmoid. Four months later, a contrast enema showed that most of the distal sigmoid was normal. It was therefore easy and safe to do colostomy reversal with minimal excision of the margins on each side. In the local/Caribbean setting, we could avoid permanent colostomy by minimizing/avoiding resection of otherwise normal sigmoid colon in perforated diverticulitis. After the sepsis has settled, the colon can be studied to determine how much colon, if any, should be resected at ostomy reversal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.