ArticleCureus2026
Factors Associated With 72-Hour Emergency Department Revisits at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe number of emergency department (ED) visits has increased locally and internationally; however, not all these visits require immediate treatment. A contributing factor to ED crowding is ED revisits. An ED revisit is defined as a patient presenting to the ED within 72 h after discharge from the previous ED visit. This study aimed to provide insights into the patterns and characteristics of ED revisits, specifically investigating the factors contributing to revisits within 72 h of discharge.
methodsThis retrospective study investigated patterns of revisits to the ED at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The study included patients aged ≥14 years who returned within 72 h of discharge between January 1 and December 31, 2022.
resultsA total of 461 patients were included in this study, of which 261 (56.5%) were females. At the first ED visit, 415 (90%) of the patients were discharged directly from the ED, and only 25 (5.4%) required admission and were then discharged. However, the same patients visited the ED within 72 h, with 313 (67.9%) being discharged directly from the ED without the need for admission or transfer during the second ED visit, while 134 (29.1%) required admission and were discharged after their hospitalization. The primary cause of revisits was the recurrence of the same complaint in 199 patients (43.2%).
conclusionsThis study provides important insights into the patterns of ED revisits. The most common reasons for revisits were illness-related factors, such as the recurrence of complaints and a lack of improvement in patients' conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.