ArticleCureus2026
A Comparative Study of Intra-articular Steroid Injection Alone Versus Steroid Injection Combined with Hydroplasty and Manipulation in the Treatment of Frozen Shoulder.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis) is a common cause of shoulder pain and disability in middle-aged adults, characterized by progressive pain and restriction of both active and passive range of motion. Despite multiple available treatment modalities, the optimal minimally invasive intervention remains controversial. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection and hydroplasty with manipulation are widely practiced techniques, yet comparative evidence remains inconsistent. Methods This randomized comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital over 18 months. Eighty patients aged 40-60 years with unilateral frozen shoulder refractory to conservative treatment were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A received intra-articular methylprednisolone injection, and Group B underwent intra-articular corticosteroid injection combined with capsular distension (hydroplasty) followed by controlled shoulder manipulation. Outcomes were assessed using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) at baseline and at two weeks, six weeks, three months, 4.5 months, and six months. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement in SPADI scores across all follow-up intervals. Hydroplasty with manipulation showed significantly greater improvement at three months (p = 0.001) and 4.5 months (p = 0.026). At six months, outcomes were comparable between groups (p = 0.457). No major complications were observed. Conclusion Both intra-articular corticosteroid injection alone and corticosteroid injection combined with capsular distension and manipulation resulted in significant improvement in pain and functional disability in patients with frozen shoulder. Hydroplasty with manipulation demonstrated superior mid-term functional improvement; however, no statistically significant difference between the two treatment protocols was observed at six months of follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.