Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037793›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Managing Orbital Floor Fractures With Three-Dimensional (3D)-Printed Surgical Guides: A Narrative Review.

Vaibhav Anand, Mohit B Bagde, Sameer Gupta, Hitesh Patel, Niraj Kumar Yadav, G Harsha Vardhan Reddy, Omkar Eswara Babu Danda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vaibhav AnandDepartment of Dentistry, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, IND.
Mohit B BagdeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS), Rohtak, IND.
Sameer GuptaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Inderprastha Dental College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, IND.
Hitesh PatelDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Niraj Kumar YadavDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. Kailash Narayan Singh (KNS) Memorial Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, IND.
G Harsha Vardhan ReddyDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery (HPB) and Liver Transplantation, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
Omkar Eswara Babu DandaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. N. T. Rama Rao (NTR) University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orbital floor fractures are a common consequence of maxillofacial trauma and can result in significant functional and esthetic morbidity, including diplopia, enophthalmos, and impaired ocular motility if not accurately reconstructed. Conventional freehand orbital floor reconstruction relies heavily on intraoperative judgment and visual estimation, which may compromise precision, particularly in complex defects involving posterior orbital anatomy. The objective of this review is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, accuracy, and feasibility of three-dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific surgical guides in the management of orbital floor fractures. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using major electronic databases to identify prospective and comparative clinical studies assessing guide-assisted orbital reconstruction, with an emphasis on surgical accuracy, functional outcomes, complication rates, and workflow efficiency. The reviewed evidence demonstrates that 3D-printed surgical guides enable more precise implant positioning and improved restoration of orbital volume by translating virtual preoperative planning into reproducible intraoperative execution. Radiological assessments consistently show reduced discrepancies between reconstructed and contralateral orbits, while clinical outcomes indicate lower rates of postoperative diplopia, enophthalmos, and need for revision surgery compared with conventional techniques. 3D-printed surgical guides represent a promising adjunct in orbital floor fracture management, offering enhanced precision, predictability, and improved functional and esthetic outcomes, although further standardized and cost-effectiveness studies are warranted.

Indexed as

orbital floor fractureorbital reconstructionpatient-specific surgical guidethree-dimensional printingvirtual surgical planning

Identifiers

PMID42037793
PMCPMC13108109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.