ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2026
A mixed-methods evaluation of outreach service provision by the "Strengthening Migrant Access to Reproductive Health in Thailand" Initiative, 2020-2024.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decolonizing Local Health: Advancing from Participation to Equitable Partnership along the Thailand-Myanmar Border.Annals of global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite considerable progress, pregnancy-related health outcomes are still below Sustainable Development Goal targets for many low-to-middle-income countries. This study evaluated the Strengthening Migrant Access to Reproductive Health in Thailand (SMARH-T) Initiative that included an outreach service provision (2020-2024) to address upstream determinants of prenatal care and a family planning service provision for undocumented migrant women and newborns along the Thailand-Myanmar border. Methods: This study employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design with a quantitative survey followed by qualitative interviews and focus group discussions. Participants were asked about their experiences with the initiative and its delivery of prenatal and family planning services. Implementation outcome frameworks were used to understand the acceptability, end-user satisfaction, appropriateness, feasibility, reach, and sustainability of the initiative. Results: A total of 407 migrant women were surveyed and 17 interviews and discussions with health providers, staff, and stakeholders ( Discussion: This mixed-methods evaluation of the SMARH-T Initiative demonstrated high service utilization, satisfaction, and reach for migrant women along the Thailand-Myanmar border. The multipronged approach incorporated reparative strategies to address this particularly vulnerable population in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.