ArticleBio-protocol2026
Quantitative Analysis of Splenic Natural Killer Cells of Mice Using Imaging Flow Cytometry.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural killer (NK) cells are crucial innate immune effectors, mediating cytotoxicity against cancer and infected cells through receptors such as NKG2D. Reliable quantification of NK cell subsets is essential for evaluating NK cell-based immune responses in cancer research. Unlike other assays, including traditional flow cytometry used in assessing NK cells, imaging flow cytometry (IFC) is a simple and direct method for quantitative analysis of NK cells. This protocol describes the necessary procedures, including harvesting splenocytes, acquiring these cells labeled with NKG2D antibodies, and analyzing IFC data with IDEAS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.