Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037758›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2026

Approach to an Initial Oncologic Patient Encounter: A Simulation-Based Training for First-Year Medical Students.

Allan John R Barcena, Marvin R Bernardino, Dominic Karl M Bolinas, Kitz Paul D Marco, Shelita Kimble, James Cavalier, Michael K Rooney, Marites P Melancon, Jillian R Gunther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Allan John R BarcenaPostdoctoral Fellow, Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5067-0334
Marvin R BernardinoResearch Data Coordinator, Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3439-2026
Dominic Karl M BolinasGraduate Student, Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6762-1149
Kitz Paul D MarcoGraduate Student, Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0966-6201
Shelita KimbleDirector, Simulation Center, Teaching, Inter-Professional, and Simulation (TIPS) Education Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6970-2728
James CavalierAssociate Vice President, Education Operations, Teaching, Inter-Professional, and Simulation (TIPS) Education Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Michael K RooneyAssistant Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Marites P MelanconProfessor, Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7447-0705
Jillian R GuntherAssociate Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5727-7594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: During an initial oncologic encounter, care providers must convey information and plans with confidence and empathy. First-year medical students often lack opportunities to develop the skills necessary for these challenging encounters. We developed a novel simulation-based training designed to prepare early-level medical students to demonstrate empathy, communicate care plans, and deliver bad news during initial oncologic patient visits. Methods: Medical students in a summer research program participated. The session included a didactic, followed by 2 simulated patient encounters: a young woman with lymphoma and an older man with rectal cancer. Students rotated through roles as primary provider, secondary provider, family member, and observer. Each simulation was followed by a faculty-led debriefing. We collected postsession feedback using a mixed-methods evaluation. The activity lasted approximately 2 hours. Results: Of the 54 participants, 49 (91%) completed the evaluation. The results were highly positive, with 100% of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing that the simulation helped them apply knowledge practically and that they would use these skills in future practice. Qualitative feedback highlighted improvements in communication skills, the importance of empathy, and the need for adaptability. Participants identified the debriefing sessions, standardized patients, and active participation as the most valuable components. Discussion: This simulation is effective for preparing medical students for the complexities of initial oncologic patient encounters. It provides a safe environment for the practice and refinement of essential clinical and interpersonal skills, fostering a more empathetic and competent approach to patient care.

Indexed as

Medical OncologySimulation TrainingStudents, MedicalAdultClinical CompetenceCommunicationEducation, Medical, UndergraduateEmpathyFemaleHumansMalePatient SimulationPhysician-Patient RelationsCancer DiagnosisCommunication SkillsHistory-TakingOncologySimulation

Identifiers

PMID42037758
PMCPMC13106612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.