ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2026
Approach to an Initial Oncologic Patient Encounter: A Simulation-Based Training for First-Year Medical Students.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: During an initial oncologic encounter, care providers must convey information and plans with confidence and empathy. First-year medical students often lack opportunities to develop the skills necessary for these challenging encounters. We developed a novel simulation-based training designed to prepare early-level medical students to demonstrate empathy, communicate care plans, and deliver bad news during initial oncologic patient visits. Methods: Medical students in a summer research program participated. The session included a didactic, followed by 2 simulated patient encounters: a young woman with lymphoma and an older man with rectal cancer. Students rotated through roles as primary provider, secondary provider, family member, and observer. Each simulation was followed by a faculty-led debriefing. We collected postsession feedback using a mixed-methods evaluation. The activity lasted approximately 2 hours. Results: Of the 54 participants, 49 (91%) completed the evaluation. The results were highly positive, with 100% of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing that the simulation helped them apply knowledge practically and that they would use these skills in future practice. Qualitative feedback highlighted improvements in communication skills, the importance of empathy, and the need for adaptability. Participants identified the debriefing sessions, standardized patients, and active participation as the most valuable components. Discussion: This simulation is effective for preparing medical students for the complexities of initial oncologic patient encounters. It provides a safe environment for the practice and refinement of essential clinical and interpersonal skills, fostering a more empathetic and competent approach to patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.