Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037731›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

Assessing the viability of genebanked seeds from rare, wild plants native to the United States using the D.E.A.D. paradigm.

Christina Walters, Lisa M Hill, Katherine D Heineman, Hannah M Tetreault, Shaimaa Ibrahim, Katherine Markstein, Cheryl Birker, Kris Freitag, Dustin Wolkis, Michael Kunz and 24 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Christina WaltersUSDA-ARS National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9035-945X
Lisa M HillUSDA-ARS National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation Fort Collins Colorado USA.
Katherine D HeinemanCenter for Plant Conservation Escondido California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-5831
Hannah M TetreaultUSDA-ARS National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5911-7316
Shaimaa IbrahimUSDA-ARS National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1939-1896
Katherine MarksteinUSDA-ARS National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9426-8862
Cheryl BirkerCalifornia Botanic Garden Claremont California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2940-111X
Kris FreitagRae Selling Berry Seed Bank and Conservation Program Portland Oregon USA.
Dustin WolkisDepartment of Science and Conservation National Tropical Botanical Garden Kalāheo Hawai'i USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8683-5855
Michael KunzNorth Carolina Botanical Garden Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6332-7010
Sheila MurrayThe Arboretum at Flagstaff Flagstaff Arizona USA.
Nathaniel KingsleyUniversity of Hawai'i Harold L. Lyon Arboretum Honolulu Hawai'i USA.
Alexandra SegliasDenver Botanic Gardens Denver Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2756-7088
Nicholas MatsumotoFairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Coral Gables Florida USA.
Thomas N KayeInstitute for Applied Ecology and Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA.
Cheryl PetersonBok Tower Gardens Lake Wales Florida USA.
Matthew A AlbrechtMissouri Botanical Garden St. Louis Missouri USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1079-1630
Noah DellMissouri Botanical Garden St. Louis Missouri USA.
Stacy AndersonSan Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Conservation Science Escondido California USA.
Steve BlackwellDesert Botanical Garden Phoenix Arizona USA.
David RemucalUniversity of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum Minneapolis Minnesota USA.
Wendy GibbleUniversity of Washington Botanic Gardens Seattle Washington USA.
Anita TillerMercer Arboretum and Botanic Gardens Humble Texas USA.
Emily CoffeyAtlanta Botanical Garden Atlanta Georgia USA.
Jason LigonAtlanta Botanical Garden Atlanta Georgia USA.
Laurie BlackmoreAtlanta Botanical Garden Atlanta Georgia USA.
Carrie RadcliffeAtlanta Botanical Garden Atlanta Georgia USA.
Heather E SchneiderSanta Barbara Botanic Garden Santa Barbara California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1230-8892
Kristen NelsonCalifornia Native Plant Society Sacramento California USA.
David SollenbergerChicago Botanic Garden Glencoe Illinois USA.
Jessamine FinchNative Plant Trust Wayland Massachusetts USA.
Kate WellspringNative Plant Trust Wayland Massachusetts USA.
Robert JettonNorth Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA.
Joyce MaschinskiCenter for Plant Conservation Escondido California USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: Genebanks must maintain viable seeds for decades. Seeds that germinate are clearly alive, but some seeds, often from wild populations, do not germinate because they are dormant, empty, aged, or damaged (D.E.A.D.). This work evaluates the effects of D.E.A.D. factors on genebanked seeds using a unique dataset to improve genebanking practices and standards for ex situ conservation of seed collections. Methods: Seeds from over 100 species were recently collected from the same populations as seeds that were genebanked decades ago. Germination proportion and speed were measured after applying various temperature, chemical, or seed coat abrasion treatments. Viability was further tested using vital staining of samples with a low germination proportion. Proportions of dormant, empty, aged, and damaged seeds were compared between seed cohorts. Results: Germination proportion and speed varied among samples, and cues to stimulate germination of dormant seeds were identified for individual species, leading to a positive correlation between viability metrics of germination and vital staining. Empty seeds primarily contribute to low germination in this study. Aging, indicated by lower and slower germination, was evident in several of the stored samples, compared to those that had been recently harvested. Discussion: This unique approach demonstrates the feasibility of genebanking seeds from diverse endangered plant species using freezer storage. Genebanking methods that are more relevant for crop seeds need to be modified when applied to seeds from wild populations because the sample sizes tend to be small and the seeds tend to germinate slowly and asynchronously.

Indexed as

genebankgerminationlong‐term storagerare plantsseed agingseed bankingseed dormancyseed longevityseed storagewild species

Identifiers

PMID42037731
PMCPMC13103544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.