ArticleApplications in plant sciences
Assessing the viability of genebanked seeds from rare, wild plants native to the United States using the D.E.A.D. paradigm.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aging and longevity in decades-old genebanked seeds from U.S. endangered plant species: Assessments using survival and RNA integrity assays.American journal of botany · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: Genebanks must maintain viable seeds for decades. Seeds that germinate are clearly alive, but some seeds, often from wild populations, do not germinate because they are dormant, empty, aged, or damaged (D.E.A.D.). This work evaluates the effects of D.E.A.D. factors on genebanked seeds using a unique dataset to improve genebanking practices and standards for ex situ conservation of seed collections. Methods: Seeds from over 100 species were recently collected from the same populations as seeds that were genebanked decades ago. Germination proportion and speed were measured after applying various temperature, chemical, or seed coat abrasion treatments. Viability was further tested using vital staining of samples with a low germination proportion. Proportions of dormant, empty, aged, and damaged seeds were compared between seed cohorts. Results: Germination proportion and speed varied among samples, and cues to stimulate germination of dormant seeds were identified for individual species, leading to a positive correlation between viability metrics of germination and vital staining. Empty seeds primarily contribute to low germination in this study. Aging, indicated by lower and slower germination, was evident in several of the stored samples, compared to those that had been recently harvested. Discussion: This unique approach demonstrates the feasibility of genebanking seeds from diverse endangered plant species using freezer storage. Genebanking methods that are more relevant for crop seeds need to be modified when applied to seeds from wild populations because the sample sizes tend to be small and the seeds tend to germinate slowly and asynchronously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.