ArticleApplications in plant sciences
Procrustean pseudo-landmark methods in Python to measure massive quantities of leaf shape data.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heat alters fruit morphology and severely limits reproduction but not growth in a widespread urban weed.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: When examining leaf shapes that are different from one another, it can be difficult to compare both the overall leaf shape and points along the leaf margin in biologically and statistically meaningful ways. Methods: To address this problem, we present a simple and user-friendly leaf shape analysis method in Jupyter Notebook and Python that uses pseudo-landmarks and generalized Procrustes analysis to measure and compare the shape of any leaf. To demonstrate our analysis, we created a repository of real leaves gathered from eight experimental datasets. Results: Using our leaf repository, we explain how we can use pseudo-landmarks to compare all leaf shapes, both within and between species, using dimension reduction techniques like principal component analysis and can predict leaf shapes using pseudo-landmarks through linear discriminant analysis. Our leaf shape analysis also maps differences in shape as leaves grew around a rosette, showing the transition of shape across development (phyllotaxy). Finally, we showed how the relationship between leaf shape variation and genetic diversity can be investigated by combining shape with genetic data. Discussion: Through the use of generalized Procrustes analysis and pseudo-landmarks, our leaf shape analysis presents a powerful tool for examining the shape of any leaf across multiple biological, ecological, evolutionary, and developmental scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.