Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037730›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

Procrustean pseudo-landmark methods in Python to measure massive quantities of leaf shape data.

Asia Hightower, Svea Hall, Ricardo Urquidi Camacho, Alexandra Papamichail, Evan Adamski, Claudia Colligan, Aidan Deneen, Gabriel Dunn, Justine Haziza, Claire Henley and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Asia HightowerDepartment of Plant Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-8754
Svea HallDepartment of Plant Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.
Ricardo Urquidi CamachoDepartment of Biology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5526-3938
Alexandra PapamichailInstitut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-CMCNB) Barcelona Spain.
Evan AdamskiDepartment of Plant Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.
Claudia ColliganDepartment of Plant Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7276-4963
Aidan DeneenDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.
Gabriel DunnDepartment of Plant Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.
Justine HazizaDepartment of Biology Acadia University Wolfville Nova Scotia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6053-644X
Claire HenleyDepartment of Plant Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.
Arnan PawawongsakDepartment of Integrative Biology University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA.
Lachlann SimmsDepartment of Biology Acadia University Wolfville Nova Scotia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9048-6663
Sean WardDepartment of Plant Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.
Manica BalantInstitut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-CMCNB) Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4316-8511
Christopher BlackwoodDepartment of Plant Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5764-6978
Charles CannonSingapore Botanic Gardens Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1901-0420
Andrea CaseDepartment of Plant Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4813-4385
Aman Y HusbandsDepartment of Biology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4580-1779
Emily B JosephsDepartment of Plant Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0889-1130
Zoë MigicovskyDepartment of Biology Acadia University Wolfville Nova Scotia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-1258
Eric PattersonDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7111-6287
Yenny Alejandra Saavedra-RojasDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6569-6960
Daniel H ChitwoodDepartment of Horticulture Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4875-1447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: When examining leaf shapes that are different from one another, it can be difficult to compare both the overall leaf shape and points along the leaf margin in biologically and statistically meaningful ways. Methods: To address this problem, we present a simple and user-friendly leaf shape analysis method in Jupyter Notebook and Python that uses pseudo-landmarks and generalized Procrustes analysis to measure and compare the shape of any leaf. To demonstrate our analysis, we created a repository of real leaves gathered from eight experimental datasets. Results: Using our leaf repository, we explain how we can use pseudo-landmarks to compare all leaf shapes, both within and between species, using dimension reduction techniques like principal component analysis and can predict leaf shapes using pseudo-landmarks through linear discriminant analysis. Our leaf shape analysis also maps differences in shape as leaves grew around a rosette, showing the transition of shape across development (phyllotaxy). Finally, we showed how the relationship between leaf shape variation and genetic diversity can be investigated by combining shape with genetic data. Discussion: Through the use of generalized Procrustes analysis and pseudo-landmarks, our leaf shape analysis presents a powerful tool for examining the shape of any leaf across multiple biological, ecological, evolutionary, and developmental scales.

Indexed as

leafmorphometricsProcrustespseudo‐landmarksshape

Identifiers

PMID42037730
PMCPMC13103534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.