Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037729›Full record

ReviewApplications in plant sciences

Evaluating nitrogen uptake: Methods and applications for plant research.

Emilia Pierce, Amanda Rasmussen, Alexandra Huddell, Erin E Sparks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emilia PierceDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences University of Delaware Newark Delaware USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1782-3560
Amanda RasmussenSchool of Biosciences University of Nottingham Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9204-8030
Alexandra HuddellDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences University of Delaware Newark Delaware USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6289-6290
Erin E SparksDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences University of Delaware Newark Delaware USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1543-6950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen is an essential nutrient for the growth and development of plants, aiding many physiological and biological functions. Due to the high demand for the nutrient, it is common for agricultural production systems to fertilize crop fields with large quantities of nitrogen. However, excessive fertilization can be harmful economically and environmentally. Understanding the mechanism by which plants take up nitrogen from their environment is critical to optimize plant growth and agricultural productions. Over the past several decades, researchers have used a variety of methods to quantify nitrogen uptake, including using nitrogen isotopes, measuring uptake through depletion of a solution over time, using compartmented chambers or agarose blocks to target specific root regions, and more recent small-scale approaches such as nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (nanoSIMS), microdialysis, and biomarkers. Several of these studies have been conducted in maize due to its high nitrogen demand and significance in global food and feed production; however, these techniques can be applied to any plant system. This review will examine the application of these methods, highlighting their advantages and limitations. By exploring existing methods, we aim to provide insights into advancing nitrogen uptake studies, ultimately supporting sustainable nitrogen management and improving crop production efficiency.

Indexed as

depletionisotopesnanoSIMStransporters

Identifiers

PMID42037729
PMCPMC13103547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.