Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037728›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

Semi-automated assessment for NatureServe subnational conservation status ranks for state floras.

Julia H Prins, Joey Shaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia H PrinsDepartment of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga 615 McCallie Avenue Chattanooga Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5100-389X
Joey ShawDepartment of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga 615 McCallie Avenue Chattanooga Tennessee USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: Conservation status ranks measure the potential risk of extinction for species at global, national, and subnational levels, taking into account rarity, threats, and trends. These assessments are largely incomplete due to funding and resource limitations. Methods: This study addressed this problem by identifying five semi-automated methods to assign provisionary NatureServe subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) to state floras. These involved (1) estimation: (1A) calculating the mode S-rank in surrounding states and (1B) assigning an S-rank based on percentage of counties with occurrence records; and (2) calculating criteria and assigning an S-rank based on the NatureServe rank calculator using (2A) a Feature Manipulation Engine (FME) workflow, (2B) NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT), and (2C) ArcGIS. S-ranks were assigned to Tennessee's native vascular flora using each method and evaluated for accuracy against published NatureServe S-ranks, human rankings, and surrounding state S-ranks. Results: ArcGIS was identified as a suitable method for future ranking efforts due to its batch processing capabilities, accessibility, and agreement with NatureServe S-ranks. Therefore, a manual was created on how other states may implement this method to update and complete their S-ranks. Discussion: By using these methods, states can more efficiently achieve comprehensive and current S-ranks, enhancing plant conservation by providing a more complete understanding of subnational extinction risk.

Indexed as

area of occupancyextinction riskFeature Manipulation Engine (FME)GISmodelingrange extentRARECATS‐ranks

Identifiers

PMID42037728
PMCPMC13103536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.