ArticleApplications in plant sciences
Semi-automated assessment for NatureServe subnational conservation status ranks for state floras.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: Conservation status ranks measure the potential risk of extinction for species at global, national, and subnational levels, taking into account rarity, threats, and trends. These assessments are largely incomplete due to funding and resource limitations. Methods: This study addressed this problem by identifying five semi-automated methods to assign provisionary NatureServe subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) to state floras. These involved (1) estimation: (1A) calculating the mode S-rank in surrounding states and (1B) assigning an S-rank based on percentage of counties with occurrence records; and (2) calculating criteria and assigning an S-rank based on the NatureServe rank calculator using (2A) a Feature Manipulation Engine (FME) workflow, (2B) NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT), and (2C) ArcGIS. S-ranks were assigned to Tennessee's native vascular flora using each method and evaluated for accuracy against published NatureServe S-ranks, human rankings, and surrounding state S-ranks. Results: ArcGIS was identified as a suitable method for future ranking efforts due to its batch processing capabilities, accessibility, and agreement with NatureServe S-ranks. Therefore, a manual was created on how other states may implement this method to update and complete their S-ranks. Discussion: By using these methods, states can more efficiently achieve comprehensive and current S-ranks, enhancing plant conservation by providing a more complete understanding of subnational extinction risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.