ArticleApplications in plant sciences
Creation of a
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: Cell suspension cultures of Douglas-fir ( Methods: Proteins isolated from the cell suspension culture medium were analyzed using mass spectrometry, as were Douglas-fir post-pollination prefertilization drops and nucellus tissue excised from the ovule at the time of drop production. Results: A total of 280 proteins ranging in size from 5 to 224 kDa were found in the three sample types. Identical proteins were found in the post-pollination prefertilization drop and in the nucellar suspension culture medium or the nucellus. Secretory proteins isolated from the culture medium were either carbohydrate metabolism-related or defense proteins, consistent with previous proteomic studies of pollination drops. Intracellular proteins were found in all three sample types and were consistent with previous proteomic studies of pollination drops, implying similar metabolic processes are at work in the gymnosperm nucellus at the time of drop production. Discussion: Cell suspension cultures of Douglas-fir nucellus are able to produce secretory proteins that are biologically relevant during pollination. This is potentially a tractable system that can overcome barriers to in situ studies presented by gymnosperm reproductive phenology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.