ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Impact of hospital process reengineering on door-to-needle time for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (PROMISE-CHINA): a multicenter prospective pre-post quasi-experimental study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02631317 (Hospital Processes Reengineering of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke in China), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Hospital Processes Reengineering of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke in China
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intravenous thrombolytic therapy significantly improves the prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke in a time-dependent manner. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of hospital process reengineering in reducing delays to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized quasi-experimental (pre-post) study included patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting within 3.5 h of symptom onset. Hospital process reengineering involved key measures such as pre-notification by emergency medical services, simultaneous activation of a multidisciplinary team, standardized communication, and regular feedback to streamline workflows. Data from pre-intervention (July 1-September 30, 2014, Q1) were compared to post-intervention (October 1, 2014-June 30, 2015, Q2-Q4). The primary outcomes included the door-to-needle time and its changes, the proportion of patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis, and the percentage of patients achieving a door-to-needle time <60 min. Results: A total of 2,059 acute ischemic stroke patients were included, with 535 in the pre-intervention period and 1,524 in the post-intervention period. Following the intervention, the median door-to-needle time significantly decreased from 73 to 63 min ( Conclusion: Hospital process reengineering significantly improved door-to-needle time, highlighting the importance of optimizing workflows in acute stroke care. Although this study was conducted a decade ago, its findings continue to offer valuable insights and practical implications for underdeveloped regions and countries. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02631317 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02631317).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.