ReviewFrontiers in neurology
Surgery for post-traumatic hydrocephalus: lessons, challenges and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) is characterized by ventriculomegaly, intracranial pressure (ICP) impairment and progressive neurological deterioration; it is a common yet often under-recognized and under-treated complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Early identification and intervention are critical for optimizing neurological recovery and functional outcomes. The proportion of patients requiring intervention for PTH is highly variable but is supposed to reach up to one-third of individuals sustaining a TBI. Shunt surgery represents gold standard treatment, but precise recommendations regarding therapeutic decision-making and operative techniques are still lacking. The aim of this narrative review is to synthetize current evidence on surgical management of PTH, highlighting available options with their respective strengths and limitations. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted focusing on studies from the past decades that reported surgical management of PTH. Relevant retrospective and prospective series, comparative analyses, and recent narrative/systematic reviews were included. Discussion: Ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS), lumboperitoneal shunting (LPS), and ventriculoatrial shunts (VAS) are the most widely explored techniques in PTH management. VPS is the most performed treatment, but LPS and VAS are feasible alternatives showing similar rate of improvement although possibly higher risks of malfunction and systemic complications should be considered. Programmable valves represent the preferred choice for PTH shunt surgery, demonstrating less complications and need of surgical revisions compared to fixed-pressure systems. ETV-traditionally viewed as a relative contraindication in PTH-has shown satisfactory results, though long-term efficacy remains uncertain. Simultaneous cranioplasty and shunting is increasingly reported in clinical practice, however there is contradictory evidence supporting its safety and efficiency. Moreover, outcomes and complications rate vary widely, reflecting the heterogeneity of patient populations, injury patterns, and timing of intervention. There is also limited but growing evidence for conservative strategies, particularly in long-term management of PTH and TBI's clinical sequelae, even though their role is less clearly delineated. Conclusion: PTH management has deeply evolved during the last decades, enhancing the standard of care and achieving better long-term prognosis, but still lacks firm consensus on diagnostic and therapeutic indications, with scarce prospective comparative data. Refining surgical decision-making and prospective, multicenter trials are crucial to improve outcomes of this complex condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.