Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037684›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

A hybrid random forest model for stroke risk prediction.

Qixuan Lu, Shuo Li, Hongyuan Xu, Hui Shen, Yufei Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qixuan LuDepartment of Cerebral Vascular Disease, Neurological Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shuo LiDepartment of Cerebral Vascular Disease, Neurological Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hongyuan XuDepartment of Cerebral Vascular Disease, Neurological Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hui ShenDepartment of Cerebral Vascular Disease, Neurological Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yufei WeiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Our study aims to develop a stroke risk prediction model by multiple machine learning algorithms and optimize the model as a stroke risk prediction tool. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study derived the original dataset from a high-quality health database. The dataset was incomplete and class imbalanced. Firstly, we eliminated extreme outliers and noises and imputed missing values by appropriate algorithms. We further used Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique to generate a balanced dataset. Secondly, we fitted seven algorithms to develop a machine learning-based prediction tool for clinical practice. Results: Overall, 35,859 participants were included, of whom 781 (2.2%) experienced a stroke. The random forest model demonstrated the best performance with high predictive value and discrimination ability. For stroke risk prediction, the AUC of the best-performing model was 0.97. Conclusion: A new random forest algorithms-based stroke risk prediction model using easily obtainable data was developed and outperformed established models. Future studies should further validate and optimize the current model to assess its generalizability and promote the wide application. The utilization of proposed random forest algorithms as an individualized risk prediction model could facilitate the application of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making.

Indexed as

machine learningprediction modelrandom forestrisk stratificationstroke

Identifiers

PMID42037684
PMCPMC13106005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.