ArticleFrontiers in neurology
A hybrid random forest model for stroke risk prediction.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Our study aims to develop a stroke risk prediction model by multiple machine learning algorithms and optimize the model as a stroke risk prediction tool. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study derived the original dataset from a high-quality health database. The dataset was incomplete and class imbalanced. Firstly, we eliminated extreme outliers and noises and imputed missing values by appropriate algorithms. We further used Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique to generate a balanced dataset. Secondly, we fitted seven algorithms to develop a machine learning-based prediction tool for clinical practice. Results: Overall, 35,859 participants were included, of whom 781 (2.2%) experienced a stroke. The random forest model demonstrated the best performance with high predictive value and discrimination ability. For stroke risk prediction, the AUC of the best-performing model was 0.97. Conclusion: A new random forest algorithms-based stroke risk prediction model using easily obtainable data was developed and outperformed established models. Future studies should further validate and optimize the current model to assess its generalizability and promote the wide application. The utilization of proposed random forest algorithms as an individualized risk prediction model could facilitate the application of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.