Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037665›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2026

Discovery tools: How powerful new scientific methods and instruments emerge and catalyze innovation.

Alexander Krauss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexander KraussSpanish National Research Council, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1783-2765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Powerful new methods and tools drive scientific progress-but how do we actually make such innovations? No theory yet explains how we invent major tools across fields. To address this gap, we examine all nobel-prize-winning method discoveries-that enabled breakthrough findings not possible without them-and we trace science's most influential toolmakers across fields, from Ernst Ruska's electron microscope and Kary Mullis's PCR method to Ernest Lawrence's particle accelerator. Here, we lay out the critical pathways taken to create these groundbreaking tools. We introduce a taxonomy of science's methods and tools: a scientific table of discovery methods that is a map of underexplored and unexplored method opportunities. By mapping the method landscape, we reveal gaps and possibilities that help guide where methods can be adapted, recombined, or strategically developed to catalyze discovery. It can help identify and predict untapped combinations of tools-and where the next breakthroughs can come from. What if we no longer wait for new discovery tools to emerge by chance but begin deliberately prioritizing their development? How many big breakthroughs are we missing because we have not yet strategically focused on designing the needed tools? We also outline the need for establishing methods labs and hubs-as incubators of innovation-that catalyze tool creation.

Indexed as

method innovationmethods labsscientific methodsscientific toolstool-driven discovery

Identifiers

PMID42037665
PMCPMC13108597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.