Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037664›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in pharmacy practice2026

Variability in Drug-Drug Interaction Identification Across Commonly Used Drug Information Resources: An Analysis of Real world Tertiary Care Prescriptions (Retrospective Cross sectional Study).

Swastik Verma, Shubham Atal, Bhavya Bhavya, Balakrishnan Sadasivam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in pharmacy practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Swastik VermaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Shubham AtalDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Bhavya BhavyaDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Balakrishnan SadasivamDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare three popular drug interaction checkers - Lexidrug, Medscape, and Drugs.com - in detecting major drug-drug interactions (DDIs) from real-world prescriptions in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: We analyzed 500 randomly selected prescriptions from a hospital database, identifying 1133 unique drug pairs. Each pair was checked for potential interactions using all three platforms. We compared how often DDIs were detected, their severity ratings, and agreement between tools using Cohen's kappa for concordance. Finding: Polypharmacy, defined as five or more drugs, was present in 23.8% of prescriptions, with an average of 6.3 drugs per patient. Polypharmacy was strongly linked to severe DDIs, showing nearly a threefold increased risk. Drugs.com identified the highest number of DDIs (21%), followed by Lexidrug (19.6%) and Medscape (16.2%). Severity ratings varied, and agreement between the tools was moderate (κ = 0.47-0.50). Conclusion: There is notable variation in detecting and classifying major DDIs among these common tools. Standardizing databases and interaction definitions is important. Meanwhile, clinicians should use multiple checkers alongside their clinical judgment to ensure safer prescribing when managing patients on many drugs.

Indexed as

Drug interactionsDrugs.comlexidrugmedication safetymedscapepolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID42037664
PMCPMC13108825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.