ArticleApplied sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Explainable Multimodal Graph Isomorphism Network for Interpreting Sex Differences in Adolescent Neurodevelopment.
Article in Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable graph-based models on multimodal biomedical data integration: a technical review and benchmarking.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Integrated brain connectivity analysis with fMRI, DTI, and sMRI powered by interpretable graph neural networks.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: A fundamental grasp of the variability observed in healthy individuals holds paramount importance in the investigation of neuropsychiatric conditions characterized by sex-related phenotypic distinctions. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) serves as a meaningful tool for discerning these differences. Among deep learning models, graph neural networks (GNNs) are particularly well-suited for analyzing brain networks derived from fMRI blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals, enabling the effective exploration of sex differences during adolescence. Method: In the present study, we introduce a multi-modal graph isomorphism network (MGIN) designed to elucidate sex-based disparities using fMRI task-related data. Our approach amalgamates brain networks obtained from multiple scans of the same individual, thereby enhancing predictive capabilities and feature identification. The MGIN model adeptly pinpoints crucial subnetworks both within and between multi-task fMRI datasets. Moreover, it offers interpretability through the utilization of GNNExplainer, which identifies pivotal sub-network graph structures contributing significantly to sex group classification. Results: Our findings indicate that the MGIN model outperforms competing models in terms of classification accuracy, underscoring the benefits of combining two fMRI paradigms. Additionally, our model discerns the most significant sex-related functional networks, encompassing the default mode network (DMN), visual (VIS) network, cognitive (CNG) network, frontal (FRNT) network, salience (SAL) network, subcortical (SUB) network, and sensorimotor (SM) network associated with hand and mouth movements. Remarkably, the MGIN model achieves superior sex classification accuracy when juxtaposed with other state-of-the-art algorithms, yielding a noteworthy 81.67% improvement in classification accuracy. Conclusion: Our model's superiority emanates from its capacity to consolidate data from multiple scans of subjects within a proven interpretable framework. Beyond its classification prowess, our model guides our comprehension of neurodevelopment during adolescence by identifying critical subnetworks of functional connectivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.