ArticlePsychological medicine2026
Characterizing executive dysfunctions in patients with schizo-obsessive comorbidity: comparing schizophrenia with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Concomitant pathologies and their impact on schizophrenia: a narrative overview of current evidence.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe term 'schizo-obsessive comorbidity (SOC)' is used to describe the presence of obsessive-compulsive symptoms or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in patients with schizophrenia (SOC). Recent studies have found overlapped executive dysfunctions in SCZ and OCD implicating shared pathophysiology. However, specific deficits in the components of executive function (EF) in patients with SOC remains unclear.
methodsWe recruited 37 patients with SOC, 68 patients with SCZ, 70 patients with OCD, and 59 healthy controls (HCs). All participants completed a battery of measures for EF components, namely initiation, sustained attention, online updating, switching, disinhibition, and planning. Apart from traditional group-mean analysis, we applied machine learning approaches to identify the unique patterns of EF among different clinical groups.
resultsThe results showed that the three clinical groups could be distinguished from HCs. The feature importance analysis showed that, to classify clinical groups from HC, online updating was the core feature of SCZ patients, whereas disinhibition and online updating jointly determine classification between OCD patients and HC. In differentiating SOC from HC, online updating, planning, and disinhibition collectively served as key features. Machine learning algorithms classified SOC and OCD with acceptable performance but classified SOC and SCZ with lower performance.
conclusionsDeficits of EF are shared features among patients with SOC, SCZ, and OCD. However, the specific components of executive dysfunction in these clinical groups appeared distinct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.