ReviewWomen's health (London, England)
Expectant management of advanced abdominal pregnancy with successful outcome: A case report and literature review.
Review in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Successful placental removal guided by MRI-based mapping in advanced abdominal pregnancy: A case report and literature review.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal pregnancy is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy associated with increased maternal and perinatal risks. In low-resource countries, diagnostic challenges complicate management. Prompt diagnosis requires a high level of suspicion. We report a 34-year-old, G3P1A+1SA, referred as a suspected abdominal pregnancy. Despite several ultrasounds and clinical signs, the diagnosis was delayed until 29 weeks' gestation with a live fetus. She was managed conservatively. A live infant was successfully extracted via laparotomy at 32 weeks of gestation. This case highlights diagnostic delays and difficulties in abdominal pregnancy, even as ultrasound use increases in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.