Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037363›Full record

ArticleBiology open2026

Bacterial killing assays in ecoimmunology require cross-validation by agreement statistics.

Mariah N Painter, Rylee C Conklin, Paige Stephens, Courtney Davis, Maxwell Soell, Franziska C Sandmeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mariah N PainterColorado State University-Pueblo, Pueblo, CO 81001, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-4500-3743
Rylee C ConklinColorado State University-Pueblo, Pueblo, CO 81001, USA.
Paige StephensColorado State University-Pueblo, Pueblo, CO 81001, USA.
Courtney DavisColorado State University-Pueblo, Pueblo, CO 81001, USA.
Maxwell SoellColorado State University-Pueblo, Pueblo, CO 81001, USA.
Franziska C SandmeierColorado State University-Pueblo, Pueblo, CO 81001, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7043-5902

Funding

National Science Foundation 221866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last 15 years, an optical density (OD-based) technique to quantify bacterial killing assays (BKAs) has been steadily gaining in popularity. This technique uses spectrophotometry to quantify bacterial growth, rather than the colony counts (CFUs) used previously, and reduces the time, resources, and variability inherent to the assay. However, we argue that the OD-based method relies on assumptions that are not true of all immune components, such as leukocytes, and that methods may not be interchangeable. We performed a targeted literature review focused on the methodology of BKAs across vertebrate taxa in ecoimmunology. We then compared the CFU and OD-based methods using leukocytes isolated from Mojave desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) and analyzed the quantification method and bactericidal ability using correlation and agreement statistics. Our results suggest poor agreement between techniques, and that immunological processes in cell-based BKAs are likely changing the optical properties of the cultures.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiological AssayImmunologic TechniquesMicrobial ViabilityAnimalsBacterial killing assayEcoimmunologyMicrobiocidal assayReptiles

Identifiers

PMID42037363
PMCPMC13225200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.