Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037273›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2026

US State Policy Index for Population Health Analyses.

Jennifer Karas Montez, Iliya Gutin, Shannon M Monnat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer Karas MontezSyracuse University.
Iliya GutinSyracuse University.ORCID 0000-0003-4216-8963
Shannon M MonnatSyracuse University.

Funding

Geographic Trends And Disparities In Psychosocial Wellbeing, Health Behaviors, And Mortality In MidlifeR01AG082699 · NIA · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI Shannon M Monnat, Jennifer Karas Montez · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG082699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy Points Changes in states' policy contexts since the 1980s may help explain why mortality rates among working-age adults have risen and become more unequal across geographic areas. Investigating this pressing issue requires a new, industry-standard measure of those contexts. During 1980-2023, higher scores on the State Policies and Politics Database (SPPD) State Policy Index (reflecting an adoption of policies that strengthen economic security, expand safety nets, and discourage risky behaviors) were strongly associated with lower working-age mortality rates. The SPPD State Policy Index is a valid, transparent, replicable, and easily updated measure that is useful for understanding how the general orientation of state policies predicts mortality. CONTEXT: Recent studies have linked the rising rates and growing disparities in working-age mortality partly to changes in US states' policy contexts since the 1980s. Yet, such studies largely rely on measures of states' policy contexts, or "policy indices," that were created for other purposes, are not regularly updated, and use complex methods that can be difficult to interpret and replicate. Further elucidating the mortality trends and disparities would benefit from a policy index that is designed for population health analyses and a clearer understanding of the utility of such indices.

methodsDrawing on the World Health Organization's Social Determinants of Health Framework and existing studies of the impact of specific state policies, we identified 11 policies to be included in an annual index from 1980-2023. It ranges from 0 to 1 on a conservative-to-liberal continuum. We evaluated the index on multiple dimensions of validity.

findingsThe index demonstrates strong validity. Exhibiting convergent validity, the index has a 0.89 correlation with two existing validated and widely used holistic policy indices created for other purposes using more than 135 state policies and two different modeling approaches. Exhibiting predictive validity, the index is strongly associated with all-cause and cause-specific working-age (ages 25-64) mortality rates. The strength of the associations is similar to those using the two existing indices but have standard errors of about one-third to one-half the size. The index is also associated with mortality at younger and older ages.

conclusionsThe State Policies and Politics Database (SPPD) State Policy Index is valid for investigating the links between the general orientation of states' policies and mortality rates. It provides researchers with a straightforward, transparent, annual, and timely index. We discuss the reasons for using policy indices, particularly in an era of policy co-occurrence, and address two criticisms of indices.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMortalityPopulation HealthState GovernmentAdultHumansUnited Statesindicesmortalitypolarizationpolicy bundlingpolicy contextspopulation health

Identifiers

PMID42037273
PMCPMC13124073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.