Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037243›Full record

ArticleBioethics2026

Discrimination Against Healthcare Workers by Patients and Colleagues, Affective Injustice and the Impact on Well-Being and Practice.

Brenda Bogaert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Brenda BogaertInstitute of Humanities in Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7557-3709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discrimination in healthcare is a pervasive issue that affects patients, healthcare providers, and quality of care. This article mobilizes the concept of affective injustice-a wrong done to someone as an affective being-to better understand the harms experienced by healthcare providers facing discrimination from both patients and colleagues. When patients discriminate, the duty to care often overrides the healthcare provider's ability to express justified emotions, particularly anger. In contrast, inter-colleague discrimination frequently takes the form of microaggressions, which are difficult to challenge. Because of these difficulties, healthcare providers often feel pressured to engage in emotional regulation strategies to manage their own affects. While emotional regulation strategies may be helpful in the short-term, we show that they do not address the root causes of discrimination and may exacerbate healthcare providers' distress, and impact care quality and staff retention. To better deal with these problems, the article will propose affective resources, opportunities, and freedoms that can be put into place to support healthcare providers and to make the workplace a more just space for all.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationHealth PersonnelPrejudiceSocial DiscriminationSocial JusticeAffectHumansPsychological Well-BeingQuality of Health CareWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID42037243
PMCPMC13460360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.