ArticleBioethics2026
Discrimination Against Healthcare Workers by Patients and Colleagues, Affective Injustice and the Impact on Well-Being and Practice.
Article in Bioethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discrimination in healthcare is a pervasive issue that affects patients, healthcare providers, and quality of care. This article mobilizes the concept of affective injustice-a wrong done to someone as an affective being-to better understand the harms experienced by healthcare providers facing discrimination from both patients and colleagues. When patients discriminate, the duty to care often overrides the healthcare provider's ability to express justified emotions, particularly anger. In contrast, inter-colleague discrimination frequently takes the form of microaggressions, which are difficult to challenge. Because of these difficulties, healthcare providers often feel pressured to engage in emotional regulation strategies to manage their own affects. While emotional regulation strategies may be helpful in the short-term, we show that they do not address the root causes of discrimination and may exacerbate healthcare providers' distress, and impact care quality and staff retention. To better deal with these problems, the article will propose affective resources, opportunities, and freedoms that can be put into place to support healthcare providers and to make the workplace a more just space for all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.