Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037090›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Optimizing Navigation and Text Messaging Interventions to Promote Participation in a Food Is Medicine Program Among People Participating in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Human-Centered Design Study.

Anuroop Nirula, Rae Denise Oanesa, Leslie Castaneda, Erika Tribett, Alexis L Beatty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anuroop NirulaSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-8134-6371
Rae Denise OanesaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0560, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States, 1 415-562-4884, 1 415-514-8150.ORCID 0000-0002-4839-5246
Leslie CastanedaDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-5775-4668
Erika TribettProject Open Hand, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-366X
Alexis L BeattyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0560, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States, 1 415-562-4884, 1 415-514-8150.ORCID 0000-0001-8405-7386

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Food Is Medicine (FIM) programs integrate interventions such as medically tailored meals or produce prescriptions into clinical care. However, there is limited evidence on how to design these programs to be responsive to the lived experiences of participants to optimize initiation, engagement, and long-term retention. Objective: The objective of the study was to develop interventions to promote initiation, engagement, and retention in FIM programs that are responsive to the lived experiences of participants. Methods: We used a human-centered design approach to engage current and former cardiac rehabilitation participants in the development of interventions to promote participation and engagement in a FIM program. We recruited participants through invitations sent via electronic health record messages. We interviewed participants about their experiences, preferences, and unmet needs related to healthy eating and program design. Additionally, we elicited participant feedback on draft versions of patient navigator scripts and text messages promoting healthy eating habits. Results: A total of six participants identified themes across Theory of Planned Behavior constructs and emergent themes, including the cost of healthy food, cultural appropriateness, clear and timely communication, transportation, local food access, scheduling flexibility, the ability to provide feedback to the program, and personalized support for navigating food resources. Participants described financial strain as a key barrier to healthy eating and noted that social influence often shaped eating behaviors. Feedback on navigator scripts led to revisions clarifying program logistics, addressing barriers such as language and cultural dietary restrictions, and tailoring positive endorsements to individual health goals. Based on participant feedback, text messages were made more concise, reframed positively (eg, humor and gratitude), and encouraged to be warmer, with respectful language that is easy to understand, while avoiding stigmatizing or overly clinical phrasing. Participants also suggested that messages should reflect empathy and offer actionable information to increase trust and engagement with the program. Trust in the health care system and a sense of dignity in receiving food support emerged as critical themes influencing overall satisfaction and retention. Participants emphasized that endorsement from their health care team and cardiologist was important for building trust in the program. Communication between health care navigators and FIM navigators could help reduce the burden placed on patients to navigate food resources. Conclusions: Using a human-centered design approach, we gained insights about participant-identified needs for navigation scripts and text messages that are culturally sensitive and personalized to promote optimal participation in a FIM program.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationPatient NavigationPatient ParticipationText MessagingAdherence InterventionsAgedFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchcardiovascular diseaseFood Is Medicinehealth equityhuman-centered designnutrition intervention

Identifiers

PMID42037090
PMCPMC13122297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.