ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Explainable AI Insights Into EEG Classification and Its Alignment to Neural Correlates.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While deep learning has drastically improved the performance of electroencephalography (EEG) analysis, it remains unclear what these models, such as EEGNet, learn from the data and how their learned features relate to neuroscientific concepts. In this work, we introduce a comprehensive interpretability framework for deep learning models of neural data based on Concept Relevance Propagation (CRP), an extension of layer-wise relevance propagation that enables the analysis of abstract concepts encoded by individual neurons and filters. We apply CRP to individual filters of convolutional neural networks (EEGNet) trained using leave-one-out cross-validation. To identify common classification strategies across models, we guide the selection of representative data for individual filters using relevance maximization, reduce dimensionality via UMAP, and identify clusters of filters encoding similar concepts through density-based clustering. To gain insight into the neural correlates of these tasks, we analyze the learned features across multiple data domains without requiring model retraining. We integrate a virtual inspection layer to project explanations into the frequency domain, enabling the simultaneous analysis of spatial, temporal, and spectral aspects using topographic maps, functional grouping, and independent component analysis (ICA). Using three EEG classification tasks-auditory attention, internal/external attention, and motor imagery-we demonstrate that our approach reveals interpretable, task-relevant neural patterns that generalize across participants. Overall, this framework provides a step toward understanding the models itself and gaining insights into the tasks in terms of neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.