Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42037059›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026

Accurate Humeral Version Angle Prediction From Limited Anatomical Data Using Statistical Shape Models.

François Bruyer-Montéléone, Maxence Lavaill, Graham Kerr, Natalia M Castoldi, Jeffrey E Bischoff, Saulo Martelli, Peter Pivonka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

François Bruyer-MontéléoneSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8915-2419
Maxence LavaillSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6124-1869
Graham KerrSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Natalia M CastoldiSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jeffrey E BischoffSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5330-1227
Saulo MartelliSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Peter PivonkaSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council FT180100338Australian Research Council IC190100020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shoulder replacement is challenged by the need to approximate the patient's pre-morbid humeral version angle (HVA) with limited information. Statistical Shape Models (SSMs) can reconstruct bone shapes and predict HVA by identifying the best global shape match. However, SSMs require visible humeral anatomy, and optimal global reconstruction does not necessarily ensure accurate HVA. Multisegmented SSMs (MSSMs) combine adjacent bones to leverage inter-bone shape correlations, but their potential remains largely unexplored. This project uses scale-free humeral SSM and three-shoulder-bone MSSM to estimate HVA from clinically available surfaces and examine how HVA accuracy relates to global and local bone reconstruction. Sixty-one registered bones were segmented (29 males and 32 females, 36.1 ± 14.3 years) from medical images. A leave-one-out method tested the models' ability to reconstruct the humerus and HVA under surgical scenarios: the SSM for cases with visible humeral parts (distal- or proximal-limited), and the MSSM for cases with no humeral information (solely on adjoining segments). SSM-based cases produced higher HVA accuracy than MSSM scenarios (max error: 3.3° ± 2.3° vs. 6.6° ± 5.4°). In both models, errors were driven primarily by marker-level discrepancies rather than global shape error. These results highlight that, when predicting anatomical measurements, SSM predictions should prioritize anatomical accuracy over achieving the best-fitting global shape.

Indexed as

HumerusModels, StatisticalAdultArthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, AnatomicShoulder JointYoung Adultbone reconstructionhumeral version angleMultisegmented Statistical Shape Modelshoulder replacement

Identifiers

PMID42037059
PMCPMC13111976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.