ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026
Accurate Humeral Version Angle Prediction From Limited Anatomical Data Using Statistical Shape Models.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shoulder replacement is challenged by the need to approximate the patient's pre-morbid humeral version angle (HVA) with limited information. Statistical Shape Models (SSMs) can reconstruct bone shapes and predict HVA by identifying the best global shape match. However, SSMs require visible humeral anatomy, and optimal global reconstruction does not necessarily ensure accurate HVA. Multisegmented SSMs (MSSMs) combine adjacent bones to leverage inter-bone shape correlations, but their potential remains largely unexplored. This project uses scale-free humeral SSM and three-shoulder-bone MSSM to estimate HVA from clinically available surfaces and examine how HVA accuracy relates to global and local bone reconstruction. Sixty-one registered bones were segmented (29 males and 32 females, 36.1 ± 14.3 years) from medical images. A leave-one-out method tested the models' ability to reconstruct the humerus and HVA under surgical scenarios: the SSM for cases with visible humeral parts (distal- or proximal-limited), and the MSSM for cases with no humeral information (solely on adjoining segments). SSM-based cases produced higher HVA accuracy than MSSM scenarios (max error: 3.3° ± 2.3° vs. 6.6° ± 5.4°). In both models, errors were driven primarily by marker-level discrepancies rather than global shape error. These results highlight that, when predicting anatomical measurements, SSM predictions should prioritize anatomical accuracy over achieving the best-fitting global shape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.