ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2026
RETRACTION: SHP2 Regulates the Development of Intestinal Epithelium by Modifying OSTERIX
Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionL. Wang, D. C. Moore, J. Huang, Y. Wang, H. Zhao, J. D-H. Yue, C. L. Jackson, P. J. Quesenberry, W. Cao, and W. Yang, "SHP2 Regulates the Development of Intestinal Epithelium by Modifying OSTERIX+ Crypt Stem Cell Self-Renewal and Proliferation," The FASEB Journal 31, no. 1 (2021): e21106. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202001091R The above article, published online on 20 November 2020 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Loren E. Wold; the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology; and Wiley Periodicals, LLC. It was anonymously reported that there was likely image manipulation present in Figures 4F and 4G. The authors responded to an inquiry regarding the concerns, but they did not provide contemporaneous replicates of the problematic microscopy panels in Figure 4G. Therefore, the editor cannot confirm the validity of the images originally presented in Figure 4G. The retraction has been agreed to because of the evidence of image duplication in the figures, which fundamentally compromises the editors' confidence in the conclusions presented. The authors disagree with the retraction.
Identifiers
42037058What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.