ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2026
Clinical Outcomes of Custom Foot Orthoses in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProgressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a painful and function-limiting condition most commonly affecting middle-aged and older adults. Although custom foot orthoses (CFOs) are routinely prescribed as a conservative intervention, evidence from large clinical cohorts remains limited. This study aimed to characterise patients with PCFD seeking orthotic care, examine demographic factors associated with pain improvement, evaluate clinical and self-reported outcomes following CFO use, and explore potential interaction effects of CFOs on clinical improvement across sex.
methodsA retrospective analysis of clinical records between January 1, 2016 and May 31, 2025 extracted 130,365 appointments across 25 Canadian pedorthic clinics, further extrapolated into 669 PCFD encounters and 12,621 asymptomatic controls. Each assessment included pain ratings, Foot Posture Index (FPI), functional tests, gait analysis, and follow-up surveys on CFOs wear time, comfort, and recovery.
resultsResults identified that PCFD was more prevalent in females and older adults. Unilateral PCFD limbs demonstrated significantly higher FPI scores (flatter feet) than contralateral healthy limbs. Both sexes demonstrated significant pain reduction following CFOs use, with females reporting higher pain at baseline and follow-up. Mean pain decreased from 6.52 ± 2.56 at assessment to 3.69 ± 2.52 at follow-up (p < 0.0001). Eighty percent of patients reported symptoms improvement, and 56% wore orthoses for more than 6 hours per day. Comfort was positively associated with both wear time and magnitude of pain reduction.
conclusionsCFOs were associated with meaningful pain reduction, improved function, and high patient-reported benefit in individuals with PCFD. These findings support CFOs as a cost-effective conservative intervention and provide essential data to inform the design of a future randomised controlled trial evaluating their clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.