Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42036883›Full record

ArticleChinese medical journal2026

Efficacy and toxicity of maintenance therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus pemetrexed vs . immunotherapy alone for stage III/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world study.

Zijian Huang, Shiqi Mei, Jiaqi Liu, Qiuyi Zhang, Zhihua Li, Guanming Jiang, Fen Wang, Chanyuan Zhang, Chang Lu, Mingfeng Zhang and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Zijian HuangGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.
Shiqi MeiGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.
Jiaqi LiuGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.
Qiuyi ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518116, China.
Zhihua LiDepartment of Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 107 Yanjiang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.
Guanming JiangThe Tenth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Dongguan, Guangdong 523059, China.
Fen WangGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.
Chanyuan ZhangDepartment of Pulmonary Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan (Foshan Hospital Affiliated to Southern University of Science and Technology), School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Foshan, Guangdong 528200, China.
Chang LuGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.
Mingfeng ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 107 Yanjiang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.
Zhihong ChenGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.
Yu DengGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.
Chongrui XuGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.
Yilong WuGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.
Jianhua ChangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518116, China.
Weineng FengDepartment of Pulmonary Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan (Foshan Hospital Affiliated to Southern University of Science and Technology), School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Foshan, Guangdong 528200, China.
Qing ZhouGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is a common challenge in clinical decision-making to optimize and select maintenance therapy (MT) regimens that balance efficacy and toxicity. This study compares the efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) monotherapy vs . ICIs plus pemetrexed as MT following initial immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

methodsWe performed a multicenter retrospective real-world study that included non-squamous NSCLC (nqNSCLC) patients who received 4-6 cycles of ICIs plus pemetrexed as the first-line treatment and continued ICIs monotherapy or ICIs plus pemetrexed as MT between April 1, 2018, and June 30, 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

resultsOut of 1060 recorded patients, 328 met the inclusion criteria for the analysis: 235 received ICIs plus pemetrexed, and 93 received ICIs monotherapy as MT. Demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. No significant difference was observed in median PFS (15.0 vs . 14.6 months; P = 0.756) between the two groups, regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) stratification. Similarly, median OS did not differ significantly (28.3 vs . 38.9 months; P = 0.799). Anemia incidence was higher in the ICIs plus pemetrexed MT group (48.5 vs . 32.3%). Patients who were rechallenged with ICIs as second-line therapy experienced improved OS compared to those who received non-ICI therapy (not reached vs . 20.4 months; P = 0.009).

conclusionThe absence of statistically significant survival difference and increased toxicity in the ICIs plus pemetrexed cohort suggest that chemotherapy may not be crucial in MT. Moreover, the significant benefits of ICIs-based therapy as a second-line treatment reinforce its value, offering confidence to both patients and physicians in making informed decisions regarding MT strategies and subsequent systemic therapies.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyLung NeoplasmsPemetrexedProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesB7-H1 AntigenImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPemetrexedProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorChemotherapyImmunotherapyMaintenance therapyNon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID42036883
PMCPMC13236284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.